Aller au contenu principal

Ancien hôpital Royal Victoria

Commentaires en ligne - English

  1. Kim Jardine
    The Mohawk community was not consulted on the development of the project and they are the rightful owners of the land. Their elders strongly suspect that there are bodies of their people buried at different locations throughout the property - murder victims and/or victims of human experimentation. An investigation with ground penetrating radar needs to be conducted. There are also possible bodies of children on the property associated with Cold War MK ULTRA mind control experimentation at The Allan Memorial Institute. Again a search for these bodies needs to be made.

    The entire property where the old Royal Victoria is located including The Allan Memorial Institute is a potential crime scene.

    The Mohawks, need to be consulted before any construction goes ahead: https://mohawknationnews.com/blog/2021/09/27/mcgill-new-vic-renovation-on-unceded-mohawk-land-audio/
  2. Michael Gale
    I support McGill's "New Vic" proposal for refocusing the former Royal Victoria Hospital.
    I am most impressed with two aspects:
    1. The preservation of the historic and iconic architecture of the RVH which is one of the defining features of downtown Montreal.
    2. Greatly enhancing the accessibility and mobility in and around the site as well as to Mont Royal Park itself.
    The "New Vic", in my opinion, has successfully responded to both ancestoral and present day interests.
  3. Helaine Helaine
    MORE GREEN SPACE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AND INTEGRATED INTO THE MOUNT ROYAL FOREST UPON THE DEMOLITION OF THE DESIGNATED BUILDINGS
  4. Sharon Lopez
    This land is on UNCEDED Indigenous territory and must firstly be offered to them in its entirety, unconditionally, and immediately.

    Barring this, the land in its entirety should be placed under a variety of emphyteutic leases which give the membership control of the buildings without complete ownership, thus guaranteeing NO PRIVATE OWNERSHIP, not even to a University. The membership would consist of private citizens representing all the stakeholders: representatives from the University, governments, the surrounding neighborhoods, the neighborhood organizations, the local merchants, AND the people without homes who also live in the area. Convert some buildings to different types of shelters for specific communities, staffed and managed by professionals and interns in medicine, social work, and relevant fields; others to social housing run by their tenants; social enterprises like cooperative daycares, repair shops, and artists' spaces would be managed by their workers. Let the architecture students of all the universities in the city collaborate to create paths to the mountain that don't require any demolition.

  5. Al Hanyok
    I personally want to see the site returned to indigenous hands. Baring that possibility, I want the site to be searched for unmarked graves before any construction is done, as has been called on by indigenous groups.

    A memorial to those affected by unethical human testing at the site should be erected so that we do not forget the horrors done here.

    If it will not be returned to indigenous hands, I want the site to remain public. Affordable housing, transitional housing, and wet homeless shelters are ideal. No expensive student housing or private enterprises.
  6. Brasfield Hope
    There should be a search for unmarked graves before any construction takes place and the land should be returned to indigenous people.
  7. Aspen Ruhlin
    The land should be returned to First Nations people, AND there should be a search for graves.
  8. Michael Kary
    The new architectural elements in the McGill plan (pages 13, 14, 16, 21 of the document <3-2-1-1_en_-_new-vic_digital-brochure_aug2021_-_digital.pdf>) are either too brutalist in style- high concrete walls for the staircases (pp.13,14,16), and for the side of the new terrace/balcony in front of the main entrance to Pavillion A (p.13, a terrible visual obstruction)- or else too much like a Griffintown glass condo tower (p.21). There should not be any large (bigger than one-half-person-height) concrete elements, and NO glass buildings, rather the new architecture should be more harmonious with the landscape and the old buildings. This can be done by using natural materials for facings (wood, stone), less simplistic designs, and keeping the glass elements to windows with detailing, rather than using glass for walls. The landscaping in front of the main entrance to Pavilion A (p.19) is too simplistic, it should not be suburban-front-lawn grass, rather suitable natural grasses and/or wildflowers, with benches. There needs to be concern for possible toxic emissions or hazardous wastes from the research laboratories working on e.g. new plastics or other new construction materials. Quebec and Canada need a new research institute dedicated to road paving materials- the asphalt we use now is neither green nor durable- will the new research plans include one? The integration of bicycle traffic with pedestrian traffic is not so simple as the plans seem to indicate, especially with downhill grades. This needs its own public consultation. Staircases should be made walkable for bicycles on the side.
  9. Michael Kary
    There should be NO commercial, business, residential, or office space on the site, ever.
  10. Donovan King
    There should be a commemorative monument to all of the victims of the Allan Memorial Institute under Dr. Ewen Cameron's leadership. He destroyed the lives of over 300 people with his CIA-funded brainwashing experiments, ruining entire families. The Survivors still have not been compensated and McGill has washed its hands of the sordid affair.

    Furthermore, there is speculation that Indigenous children involved in the experiments were buried on the site:

    https://globalnews.ca/news/8284327/mohawk-mothers-investigation-unmarked-graves-mcgill-university/?fbclid=IwAR0H7CHrhGzurEdno1PRNQQbOduArTdg_zC8CzUlpyZwoZZCdCamRzw9p0U

    To continue ignoring this scandal would do a great disservice to the site in the era of Truth and Reconciliation.
  11. Jonathan McPhedran Waitzer
    Please follow the recommendations of the excellent community consultation and report created by the Milton-Parc Citizen's Committee:

    https://ccmp-mpcc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Our-Royal-Vic-5.pdf

    Please also respect the demands of the Mohawk Mothers to suspend development until an Indigenous-led investigation can be completed:

    https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/mcgills-royal-vic-plans-prompt-call-to-check-for-unmarked-graves

    Thank you!
  12. Joanne Penhale
    The process should prioritize the voices, interests, and wishes of the Mohawk Mothers.
  13. Juniper Glass
    I support the reuqests of the Kanien’kehá:ka Kahnistensera (mohawk women), “the umbilical cord connection between mother and child” and between “human race and mother earth” the caretakers of thequenondah (two mountains/mount royal).

    I support their demand for the immediate suspension of all reconstruction plans for the Royal Victoria Hospital and Allan Memorial Institute sites on the campus of McGill University, for the following reasons:

    1]The site is unceded kanien’kehá:ka territory;
    2) The site contains archeological remains from the original precolonial Iroquoian village;
    3) The grounds of the Allan Memorial Institute must be investigated for potential unmarked graves and proof of atrocities committed during the MK-Ultra program, between 1954 and 1963.

    I look forward to the City's response.

    Warm regards,
    Juniper Glass

  14. Frank Runcie
    I think that the idea is well-thought out. I especially appreciate the modest height that maintains the view of the mountain from downtown. It also preserves the architectural heritage of the Royal Vic.

    Although I have some reservations about the concerns put forward by the Indigenous communities, on the whole I am in favour of McGill's project.
  15. Carol Smith
    It is important to remember the ANGLOPHONE HISTORY associated with The Royal Victoria , as well as its original purpose : health care, wellness, sickness prevention, rehabilitation, etc. The idea of Student Residences might be useful but not a priority when considering the Vic’s original mandate. Therefore, housing for marginalized people seems more urgent. This could include low income groups, seniors on fixed incomes, single mothers escaping abuse, etc. Proximity to nature {the mountain} is and would always be an asset to anyone ! The swimming pool must be brought back ! The Heritage element must be preserved and not forgotten.
  16. Robert Menzies
    I've learned that the Mohawk Mothers (kanien’kehá:ka kahnistensera) are demanding the suspension of McGill University’s expansion plan for the old Royal Victoria Hospital site, and an investigation into the possibility there could be unmarked graves of Indigenous children there. This possibility needs to be taken under serious, respectful consideration. I support the position of the Mohawk Mothers and their communities, and I ask that you please do the same.